The Role of Social Capital on Information and Communication Technology Based Empowerment (Case Study in Kertosari Village, Pasrujambe District, Lumajang Regency)
Keywords:
Sosial Capital, Society empowerment, ICT.Abstract
Information and Communication Technology (ICT) based empowerment is a kind of empowerment that can used as an approach to solve various rural development problems. Theoritically, the success of various empowerment is significantly depend of social capital  factor. This study aimed to analyze the role of social capital againts the success of ICT based empowerment, from the point of view of 3 parameters, that are : trust, norms and networks. The result showed that : 1) trust play a role in pushing society participation on ICT based empowerment program, that are : (i) trust on the empowerment organizers credibility, (ii) trust on the usefulness of ICT based empowerrment; 2) norms as daily customs, customs and individual character play a role to ease ICT based empowerment, that are: (i) individual character of community figures in the society have a role to build society trust on the ICT based empowerment; (ii) norms as customs have a role in the success of implementation of socialization about the existence of telecenter; and (iii) norms as daily customs have a role to ease the socialization about the usefulness of ICT based empowerment; 3) networks  play an important role againts the success of ICT based empowerment. The role of networks was to fund the development of telecenter building and facilitate the implementation of socialization activities.Â
References
Badan Pusat Statistik. 2012. Berita Resmi Statistik. Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia. Jakarta-Indonesia.
Chariri, Anis. 2009. Landasan Filsafat Dan Metode Penelitian Kualitatif (Online). http://www.eprints.undip
Colleman, 1994. Foundation of Social Theory. Translation from Colleman Book at The Belkenap Press of Havard University Press by Mutaqien Imam et al, 2009. Second Edition, Publisher of Nusa Media Bandung.
Darmawan, Ikhsan. 2011. E-Government: Studi Pendahuluan di Kabupaten Sragen. Proceeding Simposium Nasional Otonomi Daerah, LAB-ANE FISIP Untirta.
Ferda, Ahmet, Serkan Benk, & Tamer Budak. 2011. The Acceptance of Tax Office Automation System (VEDOP) By Employees: Factorial Validation of Turkish Adapted Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). International Journal of Economics and Finance, 3.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. NY: Free Press.
Fukuyama. F. 1996. Trust: Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. (Simon and Schuster).
Gauntlett, David. 2011. Making is Connecting : The Social Meaning of Creativity, from DIY and Knitting to YouTube and Web 2.0. Polity Press. (Online). www.makingisconnecting.
Halpern, David. 2005. Social Capital. Polity Press. USA.
Hasan, Bakir. 2001. Antisipasi Era Sumber Daya Informasi. Majalah Perencanaan Pembangunan Edisi 24.
Hasbullah, Jousairi. 2006. Social Capital (Menuju Keunggulan Budaya Manusia Indonesia). MR-United Press. Jakarta.
Hikmat, Harry. 2010. Strategi Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Penerbit Humaniora. Bandung.
Huraerah, Abu. 2011. Pengorganisasian & Pengembangan Masyarakat : Model & Strategi Pembanagunan Berbasis Kerakyatan.
Lena, Ng. 2011. World Bank ICT Week : Strategies for ICT – enabled Competitiveness. Singapore.
Leon, Gonzalo & Bernados, Ana M &Casar, Jose R & Kautz, Karlbeinz & De Gross, Janice I. 2000. Open IT-Based Innovation : Moving Towards Cooperative IT Transfer and Knowlede Diffusion. Iffip.
Lo, A.Y. 2013. The Role of Social Norms in Climate Adaptation : Mediating Risk Perception and Flood Insurance Purchase. Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland. Australia. Journal of Global Enviromental Change. www.elsevier.com
Mamaghani, Farrokh. 2010. The Social and Economic Impact of ICT on Developing Countries: An Analysis. International Journal of Management Vol. 27
Miles, Matthew B. & Huberman, A. Michael. 2009. Analisis Data Kualitatif : Buku Sumber Tentang Metode-metode Baru. UI Press. Jakarta.
Muhadjir, Noeng. 2000. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi IV. Rake Sarasin. Yogyakarta.
Oetojo, Asianti. 2006. Pemanfaatan TIK (Telecenter) di Pedesaan Jawa Timur. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional TIK untuk Indonesia. Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB).
Patton, Michael Quinn. 2002. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods.
Putnam, R. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic tradition in modern Italy. Princeton : Princeton University Press.
Putnam, R. 1995. Tuning in, tuning out : The strange disappearance of social capital in America. Political Science and Politics.
Quibria, M.G. dan Tschang, Ted. 2001. Information and Communication Technology and Poverty : An Asian Perspective. Institute Working Paper 12. ADB Institute Tokyo.(Online). http://www.adbi.org .
Rao B. 2001. East Asian Economies : The Miracle, a Crisis and the Future. McGraw-Hill. Singapore.
Riemer, Kai dan Klein, Stefan. 2008. Is The V-form The Next Generation Organisation? An Analysis of Challenges, Pitfalls and Remedies of ICT-enabled Virtual Organisations Based on Social Capital Theory. Journal of Information Technology.
Roy, Sumit. 2005. Globalisation, ICT and Developing Nations : Challenges in The Information Age. Sage Publications India Pvt Ltd. New Delhi.
Seeman, Elaine dan Shanan Gibson. 2009. Predicting Acceptance of Electronic Medical Records: Is the Technology Acceptance Model Enough? S.A.M. Advanced Management. Journal, 74.
Sobels, Jonathan & Curtis, Allan & Lockie. 2001. The Role of Landcare Group in Rural Australia : Exploring the Contribution of Social Cpital. Journal of Rural Studies, Volume 17.
Soetomo, 2009. Pembangunan Masyarakat, Merangkai Sebuah Kerangka. Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta
Suharto, Edi (2007). Modal Sosial dan KebijakanPublik.www.policy.
Taher, Elza Peldi. 1987. Menatap Masalah Pembangunan Indonesia. Jakarta : Lembaga Kajian Masyarakat Indonesia.
Todaro, Michael P dan Smith, Stephen C. 2006. Pembangunan Ekonomi. Penerbit Erlangga. Jakarta.
UNCTAD. 2008. Information Economy Report 2007-2008. Science and Technology for Development : the new paradigm of ICT.
Venkatesh, Viswanath, Fred D. Davis. 2000. A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46.
Vipriyanti, Nyoman Utari. 2011. Modal Sosial & Pembangunan Wilayah : Mengkaji Success Story Pembangunan di Bali. Universitas Brawijaya Press, Malang.
Wallis, J. and Dollery, B. 2001. Government Failure, Social Capital and The Appropriateness of The New Zealand Model for Public Sector Reform in Developing Countries. World Development. 29 (2).
World Bank. 1998. The Local Level Institutions Study (Social Capital Working Paper Series). Washington DC: The World Bank.
Yananto dan Adiraras, D.T. 2008. Analisisi Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Terhadap Implikasi Pemanfaatan TIK Pada KUKM di Indonesia (Studi Empiris pada KUKM Peserta UG-ICTA 2008). Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis No.2.
Yin, R.K. 2013. Studi Kasus : Desain & Metode. PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.
